Paul Hagen's blog

Beware of NDAs

In a day and age when most technology providers - small and large - offer 30-day free trials of their software, it seems incredibly odd for a membership management provider, Association Anywhere, which recently asked a nonprofit to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). Stating that the company did "business in a very defined and focused space," the vendor actually turned the business away when we refused to sign the agreement.

I can appreciate a vendor wanting to keep its intellectual property safe and ensuring that there is a legitimate client looking at it's software, but this kind of legal clamping down on openness struck me as an affront to the nonprofit sector. Given the tight budgets in the nonprofit sector, I expect vendors (especially those which are strong) to encourage discussion about their products amongst peers. Is Association Anywhere really going to sue a nonprofit for sharing its experience with the software with colleagues or the community?

Web 2.0 sorely missing in Membership Management suites

In been looking for a membership management system that

Micro projectors

While procrastinating I came across an article about cell phone projectors coming down the pike. It links to a review by the NY Times of one these devices already being sold. It struck an inner geek chord, and I thought, "cool". Amazon shows them selling for $200-300, though the reviews leave a bit to be desired. Mobility is a beautiful thing.

Online outreach metrics & budgeting

For those wondering about metrics, eMarketer just put out an article with some informative benchmarks....

Email open rates look like they're steady between 19-20%, and clickthrough rates close to 6%. The article stated that "e-mail drove an average of $0.14 in revenues per delivered message" and that segmentation and personalization significantly improved these numbers. I'm not sure what that entirely means outside of the context of type of email, but good food for thought.

Equally interesting was projected online spending. While the gross numbers may not give much insight to the average nonprofit, I was interested in the percentages by area to help me think about how my clients should be budgeting their online marketing spend. Nearly 50% of the spend is on search engine adwords; since nonprofits can get $10k/month Google Adword Grants, I took that number out of the total spend to get some guiding percentages:

Search engine ad words: 50%

Of the remaining spend...
- Display ads: 36%
- Classified: 24%
- Rich Media: 15%
- Lead Generation: 12%
- Sponsorships: 5%
- Video: 5%
- Email: 3%

I'm a big believer that organizations need to measure measure measure to see what works best for its audiences, but I thought this was as good a place as any to start. As they say, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Selling the Experience: The Quest for a Constituent-Centric Nonprofit

Companies like JetBlue, Starbucks, and Apple don’t sell just a product or service; they sell an experience. So, what does this have to do with nonprofits? I would argue that some nonprofits do a pretty good job of packaging “experience” with what they do. Heifer, Save the Children, and Kiva do a pretty decent job of connecting donors directly to recipients, using online tools for donors to view pictures and stories of the people they are directly supporting. I would also argue in this communications-hyped world, your nonprofits’ actions speak louder than words.

How well is your nonprofit doing at creating a superior constituent experience? According to market research firm Forrester Research, there are three areas to look at:

1)Obsess about constituent needs. While your organization may have its own needs and wants (e.g. raising money, filling events, selling subscriptions, and serving individuals), constituent-centric organizations identify different target segments and spend time getting to know the wants and needs of those constituents well.
2)Reinforce the brand with every interaction, not just marketing. Every interaction that a constituent has with a staff person, web site, or voice response speaks volumes about your organization’s brand. Marketing messages struggle overcome a bad experiences. Review and fix processes that don’t reinforce the essence of your organization.
3)Treat customer experience as a competence everyone needs to have. Interact with any staff -- checkers, stockers, customer service – at companies like Trader Joes or Whole Foods and you will find super friendly help; it’s not just management or communications. Management at companies like Jet Blue spend as much or more time reminding staff of the desired customer experience as they do communicating that externally.

What’s the bottom line of creating great constituent experiences? Of the 112 companies and 5000 consumers that it researched, Forrester found that firms with the best experiences resulted in 15% more consumers purchasing additional products or services over those with the worst rated experiences. Furthermore, customer reluctance to switch to competitors was 18% higher for those with the best experiences compared to the worst. Translating to nonprofits, this means more people donating, attending addition events, and more services consumed, as well as fewer constituents opting to send their money and spend their time with alternative nonprofits.

Convio + Salesforce = A Promising Common Ground

I’ve been playing around with Convio’s new fundraising management tool built on Salesforce called Common Ground. Bottom line: I’m super impressed! While software rarely ever fully impresses me, Convio did a bunch of things right:

- Very strong donor management baseline for most nonprofits. For the vast majority of nonprofits (especially small- to mid-sized ones), Convio outstrips the functionality most will need.
- Doesn’t break Salesforce mold. Unlike other solutions that attempt to cover over the standard object names and structure of the Salesforce database, Convio stays true to it. This means that it will stay aligned much better with continuing development of the platform, as well as enable flexibility for other applications that use standard object names.
- Reasonable pricing. My biggest fear was that it’s pricing structure would put it outside the reach of most nonprofits, like it’s content management system. However, they came in at $100/seat with a minimum two seat minimum. While outside the reach of the smallest organizations, it seems very fair, especially given the power of the platform that the nonprofit gets.

Add a bunch of great third party tools that are available in the Salesforce ecosystem (Vertical Response for bulk email, Demand Tools for data cleaning, a couple of options for events, ect.), Common Ground adds a really strong puzzle piece that most nonprofits need.

The biggest oversight and a big bummer right now is not having a basic online transaction engine built in so that nonprofits can take online donations and have those feed right into the system. Even using an already available PayPal alternative would be better than nothing.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see the company continue to migrate more aspects of its platform over towards Salesforce and leverage the vast amount of development happening in the ecosystem. This positions it well to compete against Blackbaud across a broader market.

New Years Resolution Idea - Clean Data

As I've been considering my own New Years Resolutions, I started thinking about what one client was thinking about for 2009. I was asked to put together my thoughts for a data maintenance ‘ritual’ for their new Salesforce system to ensure that they keep their data clean. Fantastic!! It's no new news that working out and eating healthy help you function in life better; similarly, it's old news that clean data helps your organization operate more effectively. Nevertheless, the beginning of the year serves as a new reminder to get in shape. I thought I'd share my quick list culled from various sources here. Would love any other suggestions.

Daily/Weekly



  • Back-up database. Set up an automated backup to be generated that can be download weekly.
  • Duplicate check. Check “Demand Tools” reports regularly to check for duplicates and other redundant data.
  • Scan for junk leads. Doing regular scans for junk Lead records that are filled with gibberish values from sources like online forms.
  • Check For & Tackle Incomplete Records. While most CRMs can validate or require certain data fields, it’s not always easy to ensure a value for every field at the time when a record is generated. For example, if staff import a list of event attendees with only name, title and phone numbers, it has very little value if it needs to be used in an email or direct mail campaign. While appending missing data is may require a lot of manual effort which will feel time consuming, it is a necessary evil to ensure that you have ‘actionable’ data.
  • Returned mail. Update contact records when mail is returned. [Determine policy…what happens? Alert to owner? Purge? Phone call?]


Weekly/Monthly



  • Run executive reports weekly/monthly. Use key organizational reports to spot poor data (as well as poor performance). Data that doesn’t match expectations are either an indicator of poor data management or poor performance by the individual.
  • Scan communications lists. Review lists (reports) that School Volunteers will use for communications (email, invitation lists, etc.). Is there missing data? Is data in the right format?
  • Run exceptions reports monthly. Run reports run monthly to find records with incorrect picklist values.

Quarterly



  • Post email cleaning. Use tools in VerticalResponse to identify Returned Mail or Bounced emails so that bad lead records can be updated/purged.
  • Delete or archive old data. Organizations merge, get acquired or shut down, contacts change addresses, change jobs, move within an organization …CRM data does expire. This is an area which is not easily automated and requires investment of time and energy. The more regularly you check for expired data, the healthier your data will be. According to one source, a database unchecked for an entire year can see as much as 30% expired data.
  • Data enrichment. Regularly ask what additional data in each record would help staff do more and have better insight. Adding political campaign contributions? Adding annual revenues of Community Based Organizations or Foundations?

Reality mining – discovering common sense

This weekend’s article in the NY Times about “reality mining” – analyzing data based on people’s actual physical movements through an increasing array of wireless devices and chips – reminds me of the power of common sense. While super concerned about the privacy implications of increasingly intrusive tracking and data mining, I’m always curious about what is actually being learned. In this case, the NY Times states:

“The Media Lab researchers have worked with Hitachi Data Systems, the Japanese technology company, to use some of the lab’s technologies to improve businesses’ efficiency. For example, by equipping employees with sensor badges… the researchers determined that face-to-face communication was far more important to an organization’s work than was generally believed. Productivity improved 30 percent with an incremental increase in face-to-face communication.”


As someone who has been known to text or email people in the same office, it gave me pause. But then again, who hasn’t had those experiences where 5 emails later, when an issue hasn’t been solved, you pick up the phone or just walk over to a colleague’s cube in the other room and the issue is dealt with in a couple minutes. And, despite my pride at being able to work from anywhere, I’ve made a concerted effort to spend more time in my clients’ offices this year (more face-to-face time) – which has made a huge difference in the quality of experience (both mine and theirs), even though I waste time commuting 20 minutes each way.

Funny, sometimes it just takes MIT researchers with sophisticated new technology to make a discovery that’s published in the NY Times to tell me what my common sense let me know a while back. The good news is that after Thanksgiving, I’m happy to have the excuse to get off my arse for more face-to-face time.

1 Million Volunteers by Inauguration

I’m sure many of you felt the excitement that yesterday’s election results generated. The spontaneous celebrations that erupted in the streets were amazing! Truly a new day in America when people rejoice in the streets following an election rather than just a sports event.

As both Obama and many commentators have noted, however, now the real work of nation-rebuilding starts. With that, it struck me that now was a ‘kairos’ (opportune moment in time) opportunity for the big volunteer organizations to recruit volunteers. Obama’s organization did an amazing job mobilizing people and there’s a lot of good will out there. With his hands full with any number of messes (financial, Iraq/Afghanistan, etc.), Obama’s going to need the same kind of help on the ground that got him to office to fix the nation .

Similar to the ‘million man march’, I’d like to see the major volunteer organizations launch a drive to get 1 million new volunteers by inauguration day in January (or by the end of his first 100 days). All those energized by putting Obama into office, now focus the energy on re-constructing a great nation. Consider channeling that energy into Volunteer Match, Points of Light, San Francisco School Volunteers, Breakthrough Collaborative, Idealist.org or one of the hundreds of other worthwhile organizations.

I realize this is a technology blog, so let me take a moment and tie this to my last post about looking for process makeovers. ‘Kairos’ moments like now don’t come around often. The opportunity to take advantage of a huge amount of good will has little to do with having the latest social networking or web 2.0 tools, but rather how well your organization is equipped to train, support, and parse work out to volunteers. It’s a process. Volunteer management systems can certainly help manage large volumes of volunteers. However, without the orientation and support processes solid – and work parsed into bite-sized chunks for volunteers – volunteer management systems will help only marginally.

Bad Economy? Look for Process Makeovers on the Basics.

The Obama’s campaign use of the most boring of technologies impressed me most: database applications for tracking voter contact. Why? It went back to the basics of what a campaign needs to do -- Get Out the Vote (GOTV). The use of social networking tools, text messaging, facebook, and other web 2.0 tools was icing on the cake, but his technology success had first and foremost to do with his getting the basics in place.

This said, let me offer a couple thoughts to organizations that are feeling the pinch from the economy. You don’t necessarily need to invest in new technology. You may need to jigger staff roles and carve out time for them to focus on the basics.

Pardon the sports analogy, but make sure you’re executing flawlessly on the blocking and tackling. What are the key activities that your organization does? At every step of the way for each of these activities, does your staff and web site have the content that constituents need? Does your staff and web site provide easy ways for individuals to take actions? When they take actions, are you capturing their data in a consistent and systematic way? Are you able to use that data easily when there are opportunities to communicate with them?

I’ve seen very few organizations that don’t benefit from going back to re-looking at the basics of what they do.
Syndicate content