Home  |   Reports and Articles  |   Online Seminars  |   Donate  |   Blog  |   About Us

Monday, December 01, 2008

Managing by Maxim

by Peter Campbell

I'm a big fan of maxims, adages, anything that sums up an important, and possibly complex point in a sentence that can convey, if not the whole point, at least a conversation starter. The main challenge for a technology manager is communication, particularly with those who are uninterested and/or threatened by technological terms. I live and breathe this stuff, but I understand that I'm in the ten percent, the ten percent of people who like and are completely comfortable with technology. The rest of the world ranges from averse to highly competent, but not gaga over it all, like I am. Remembering that, and approaching each project and decision with that in mind, has helped me accomplish significant things for people who aren't necessarily bought in to all of my ideas on first listen.

My current favorite maxim is Users own functionality, techies own platforms. This encompasses a couple of key concepts. First, technology isn't owned by IT or the people they serve; it's owned by both those who install it and those who use it. Therefore, technology can't be evaluated and planned for solely by one group or another. But I've seen lots of cases of both - IT rolling out a fundraising database or point of sale system with no input from the people who will base their revenue goals on the systems' capabilities; and staff rolling out equally complex systems with little or no IT guidance. Both situations are likely to be a big waste of funds and effort. Second, the breakdown is clear - IT might be wowed by the cool, Ajaxy interface on that web app, but if it doesn't have the reporting capabilities that the users need, they might be better served by something less flashy. That's for the users to decide. But IT will have a better read on how sound a database structure is for querying and reporting, or what will integrate successfully with other key systems. So IT should have sway over the technologies used, to a large extent.

If you build it, they won't come is another favorite. Unlike some cinematic baseball greats, techies can't build huge systems in anticipation of user's needs and expect them to be adopted, no matter how great the systems are. Clearly identified needs and ample amounts of input and involvement are required for home-grown system development. At my job, I am pushing agile development, which includes user testing and input from early on in development. This means that I'm teaching my staff how to let go a bit, and be more open to feedback, as I'm teaching the non-techie staff how to evaluate functionality in unfinished, and possibly somewhat ugly systems. It's not as much training as it is imploring all parties to have some faith in each other.

In business communications, you haven't said anything until you've said it three times in three different mediums. This one was taught to me by one of my greatest mentors, an ED at a commercial law firm that I worked at in the 90's. It boils down to the terser rule of thumb: Assume that they haven't read your email. The biggest mistake that we all make is thinking that we've made our intentions and priorities clear by sending a memo or an all staff email. The truly important initiatives that you're pushing through should be reiterated and the message diversified, to reach people who may not respond to your favorite medium. And, as Paul has well-pointed out, at least one of those mediums should be verbal, and hopefully in the same room.

What are the maxims that you manage and survive by? Leave your best ones in the comments.

Labels: , ,

9 Comments:

Anonymous David Schach said...

The most accurate maxim I've ever heard is this: All IT decisions and changes are made from the top down.
It means that no matter what the end-users want, unless management decides on a system, it will never happen. When selling an IT solution to a company, one needs to be sure to have high-enough management buy-in, which may mean C-level or just department managerial, depending on the situation. In the case of a sales tool like Salesforce, the only way to enforce adoption is sometimes to use economic incentives to use the new system, or disincentives to use the old one; only management can do that.

11:42 AM  
Blogger Peter Campbell said...

Definitely a good one, David -- I phrase it as "change and accountability flow from the top" - if Board and Execs don't embrace the change and stand accountable for it, technology deployment is, at best, tricky. Salesforce is a great example, because CRM is rarely owned by one department, or, if it is, it's underutilized.

12:22 PM  
Blogger Steve Heye said...

OK, here are my two favorites.

New technology on bad process is just doing bad things faster. For technology to be most effective you have to change your processes and maybe the people\skills as well.

Data without a purpose is just a bigger pile of garbage (or other explicative). Meaning just collecting more data that will never be used is an effort in futility.

2:01 PM  
Blogger Laura S. Quinn said...

A few that have come in handy for me in the realm of internet strategy:

A button is not a strategy Particularly useful for donate buttons....possibly redundant with "If you build it, they won't come"

If you emphasize everything, you prioritize nothing I've used this a lot for homepages, but it's really true of anything, even internal development plans. If you say everything is absolutely critical, you're giving the shaft to the few things that really are.

3:30 PM  
Blogger Chad Sutton said...

One I've drilled into my staff over the years:

"An ounce of perception is worth a pound of performance."

If your users think IT is doing a great job, it is.

4:30 PM  
Anonymous PM Hut said...

Here's one a Project Manager I knew told me several years ago, back when I was a Programmer:

"Money delays the problem, but does not make it go away".

Another one that I also think is worthwhile (and this is my invention, but I'm sure many people know about it):

"Keep yourself away from your team members' personal lives". Although it is very tempting to show them how you care, this can have a devastating effect on your career in case things go wrong...

I think probably most of us can relate to this one...

6:26 PM  
Blogger Jon Stahl said...

Risk can't be eliminated, it can only be managed. You can't outsource your project risk onto consultants; at least not onto smart consultants.

There are always multiple right answers. For most situations, there's no "one best tool" that magically solves all your problems, there are probably several good options. Success will depend on how well you wield one, not which one you choose.

8:16 PM  
Blogger Peter Campbell said...

My post missed this favorite, which came up in a conversation with my boss yesterday: "Contrary to common assumption, people don't fear change. They love change. They fear disruption".

12:17 PM  
Anonymous Steve MacLaughlin said...

If everything is a priority, then nothing is a priority.

Building for the exception is building for chaos.

If you don’t have a strategy, then you get the results you deserve.

1:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

The Idealware Blog

Thoughts and resources to help nonprofits choose software, from:

Subscribe to This Blog


Recent Posts