Elizabeth Pope's blog

The Facebook Shuffle

The other day, I realized that I've been on Facebook for exactly nine years-- the timeline feature tells me I joined on March 6, 2004, back when it was still thefacebook.com. My undergrad institution was the third university to get access to the site, which was much-hyped even then, and I remember waiting with bated breath for midnight to arrive so I could set up my profile (yep, I was pretty cool in college). That means that I've been a Facebook user longer than I've lived in any one city, longer than I've had a driver's license, and about four times longer than I've known my husband. In fact--yikes-- I've been on the site for just about one-third of my life. Kind of puts things in perspective, no? 

I don't want to think about how many hundreds of hours I've spent scrolling through photos of high school friends, procrastinating writing papers, first in college and later in grad school, and scanning the status updates of people I've only met at conferences. I've thought about quitting the site lots of times, but love the way it helps me keep in touch with my friends and family, especially since I've now moved far away from most of them. It looks like I'm not the only Facebook user who's thought about leaving. A new Pew Internet and American Life research report, "Coming and Going on Facebook", indicates that 61% of their sample size of the network's users have taken a break of a few weeks or more over the course of their membership, and close to a third plan to spend less time on it in the coming year. Twenty percent have already left. Why'd they go? Most people reported they were too busy, weren't interested in what they saw there, or found it to be it was a waste of time.

Nonprofits who've spent a lot of time maintaining their organization's presence on Facebook might be getting a sinking feeling right about now. I don't think the news is all that bad, but I do have a sense that among my generation and the one just behind me, the site is getting far less popular. This small exodus is something to watch, not to panic over. Facebook's ubiquity isn't going away anytime soon. Still, it's a good time for organizations heavily invested in the tool to make sure that their communications mix is diversified to ensure that they continue to reach all their constituents wherever they spend the most time.

 

What Does It Mean to Have a Favorite Charity?

Our pals and frequent partners over at NTEN teamed up with Charity Dynamics to conduct a survey of  donor engagement with their charitable causes. They've issued a report summarizing the results, and they came up with some pretty interesting findings. Among them was that although most donors gave to more than one organization, close to half of the donors have a "favorite" charity, which is the one to which they reported donating the vast majority of their total philanthropy dollars over the course of a year. If a donor has a preferred organization, that organization receives an average of 90 percent of that individual's giving. And most of these folks were giving at least $100 a year.

Ninety percent is a pretty jawdropping amount. So how do you become a donor's favorite charity, and how do you find the people who will fall in love with your organization's cause? NTEN recommends practices that Idealware has also found to be extremely effective. Ensure that you're maintaining a balanced communications mix when you reach out to your consituents-- not just direct mail or through a website, but a variety of approaches. But don't "try to be all things to all people," as the report cautions-- meet your donors where they are, and make smart, targeted asks to the right groups of people.

There's a lot more in the report, which you can download for free here:

http://www.nonprofitdonorengagement.com/

How will you become your donors' favorite charity?

Remixing the Clark

As a recent transplant to New England, I took the requisite leaf-peeping road trip last weekend through Western Massachusetts and Vermont. Along the way, I stopped at a museum, and was blown away by what they’re doing with technology.

The Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute in Williamstown, Mass. is undergoing a major renovation that won’t be completed until 2014, and much of their permanent collection is in storage. To make the most of this period, the Clark has been experimenting with crowd-sourcing one of its exhibitions, called Remix. Visitors can virtually curate, or “remix”,  selected artworks using a homegrown app called uCurate. A sister app, uExplore, comes preloaded on tablets that are handed out to visitors upon arrival in the gallery; essentially, it’s like you have a portable curator that tells you neat things about the art you’re viewing.  Certain visitors will even get to have their selections displayed in the galleries.
 
The New York Times covered the Clark’s work in detail back in March—check it out. And even if you’re not going to be in Western Mass for leaf season, you can curate your own virtual exhibit on the Clark’s Remix site and see what other folks have done: http://remix.apps.clarkart.edu/.

A Few Good Statistical Analysis Tools

Whether your organization needs to measure its programmatic success or expand its donor base, statistical analysis software can help nonprofits become more data-driven and accountable.

If this sounds appealing, you’re in luck: powerful tools that only five or ten years ago required dedicated servers to run can now be installed on a desktop. But these packages can require a considerable investment in up-front and ongoing costs, staff time, and training. Overwhelmed by the choices and not sure if you have the necessary statistical chops? We talked to a statistician to get the latest on some of the options available.

Low-Cost Options and Open-Source Tools

If your software budget is tight and your statistical analysis needs are basic, consider Excel. You probably have it and understand the platform.  Drawbacks: Excel can’t automatically handle missing cell values, and its statistical output can appear clunky and scattered. Windows users can install the built-in Analysis Toolpak, but Excel for the Mac OS now requires a free downloadable add-on, like Statplus: Mac LE. These tools amp up your spreadsheet software with features like regression analysis, analysis of variance, and sampling. Excel costs about $120 per license as a stand-alone product, with volume discounts available.
 
The most popular open-source statistical software, R requires some programming knowledge to navigate its command-line interface. Users enter lines of code to execute R’s functions, but even those lacking a sophisticated computer science background can learn it quickly. R runs on a variety of operating systems, and its thriving user community will help if you get stuck. Nonprofit staffers familiar with programming basics and with a firm grasp of statistical concepts may find R a good choice.
 

For More Advanced Needs

For users with moderate-sized data sets, Stata is an affordable option, starting at $1,195 ($600 for academic users) for STATA/IC, the standard version. The software lacks the power of some other options on the market, and can only open one data set at a time. Unlike other proprietary software, though, Stata is easily customized, and can handle downloadable user-written commands that significantly expand its capabilities. Stata also draws praise for its tech support, helpful user community, and relative ease of use. Stata has both a graphic, menu-based interface and a command-line interface for those with more programming know-how.
 
IBM's answer to statistical analysis receives high marks for its user-friendliness. In addition to a syntax editor, SPSS Statistics has a point-and-click graphical interface that doesn't require substantial programming knowledge. This ease of use comes at the expense of some control over statistical output. Nonprofits in need of basic statistical analysis won't find this an issue, but if you seek to do more sophisticated data manipulation, SPSS might prove frustrating. The standard desktop package starts at $5,120 for a user license and a year of support, with higher pricing for concurrent use.
 

The Top of the Line

With more than one-third of the market share, the SAS Institute is the giant of the statistical analysis software scene. Strengths include power and efficiency in linking large data sets, and a comprehensive built-in set of statistical analysis features.  SAS Analytics Pro, the entry-level desktop version of the software, costs $8,500 per user for first-year license fees alone and about $2,000 per year for ongoing use. This software is not for novices, and requires a high degree of statistical and technological expertise to run it. However, SAS offers excellent tech support, and its prevalence means finding others in your network who use the software will be a snap.
 

A Note of Caution

If your statistical background consists solely of hazy memories of Stats 101, a refresher might be in order. Misrepresenting data, even if done unintentionally, will get a nonprofit into trouble with its donors, board, and other stakeholders. In this case, a little information can be a bad thing.
 
Thanks to Henry Quinn for his recommendations and advice.

 

Community Voting for 2013 NTC Sessions Open Until September 7

Our good friends an partners at NTEN put on the Nonprofit Technology Conference every spring. It’s always a wonderful opportunity to get up-to-date on what’s happening in the field. (Because the 2013 conference will be in beautiful Minneapolis, it will also be an opportunity to try these delicious-looking walleye cookies.) You can help shape how the conference will look by taking part in community voting for the session proposals, which is open until midnight EST on September 7. Find out more about the voting guidelines here.

At Idealware we look forward to the conference each year, and we’re excited about the sessions we submitted for the 2013 conference. We’ve listed the session titles below-- you can read the full description on NTEN's site by following the embedded link. If you think any of the sessions look like something you’d want to attend, feel free to give it an up-vote!
 

Get Your Technology Project Funded!

Bridging the Technology Funding Gap

Maturing Your Organization's Social Culture ... By Creating a Policy?

Finding a Pitch-Perfect Voice for Your Organization

The Idealware School of Video Production for Nonprofits Who Don’t Video Good

The Wide, Wide World of eLearning

More Than Apps: Affordable Program Delivery Through Mobile Phones

Service Beyond Geography: Using Technology to Serve People Remotely

Measuring Your Mission: Using Data to Track Organizational Health and Success

From Digital Divide to Digital Inclusion: Technology as an Equalizing Force

Measures of Success: Practical Tools to Evaluate Your Organization's Programs

Avoiding the Digital Dark Age

I came to Idealware from the library world: I earned a master’s degree in library and information science and worked as an archivist for a few years.  Archivists make sure that users can access and understand information in all formats for years to come. Not all information survives, of course. In fact, at the National Archives, where I worked, we were tasked with preserving and describing only those Federal government records deemed “permanent”, or critical for our democracy to continue to function. (That’s only about 1%-3% of all the records that the Federal government generates.)

Did we have to make sure all this important stuff was kicking around forever? Not exactly.  Even acid-free paper disintegrates eventually, no matter how much you do to preserve it. Born-digital records—e-mails, documents, video, audio, databases, photographs, etc—are proving to be even trickier.  Some digital preservation scholars think that future historians will call this era the digital dark age due to the amount of information our society faces losing.

What about your nonprofit’s electronic records—will they become a part of the digital dark age? Preserving your legacy might seem like a lofty issue, or one that only established organizations with institutional archives need to consider. But consider what would happen if all of your work e-mails vanished overnight, never to be seen again. How might that affect the health of your organization? What about all of your social media—what will happen to all of your carefully crafted posts and your network of followers if the platform you use folds? Check the End User License Agreement—the platform’s creators probably don’t owe you very much.

Chris Prom, an archivist at the University of Illinois and the brain behind the blog Practical E-Records, does a fabulous job of outlining the big-picture issues at hand in his paper “Facilitating Archives in a Facebook Era,” posted in draft form here. (Full disclosure—Chris was my boss when I was a graduate assistant at the University Archives.) Describing the problems inherent with “ensuring the preservation of evidence when people’s communication tools have, in effect, become the organization’s official recordkeeping mechanism”, he concludes that to capture e-mail, social media, and other ephemeral digital communications, “what people need most are practical tools and services.” A statement after Idealware’s own heart!

 Chris and his colleagues at Illinois are proposing to develop a tool called myKive, an open-source and customizable personal archiving software that will to capture the digital interactions of its users without affecting their daily routine and that will give them complete control over the data harvested. Like many others interested in digital records, I’ll be following the tool’s development closely in the hopes that it might have some application for nonprofits looking to preserve their digital legacy in an easy and cost-effective way. Let’s hope we can stave off the return of another dark age!

Heller Consulting on Constituent Relationship Management

Heller Consulting recently released a thought-provoking report that explores the ways in which nonprofits are approaching Constituent Relationship Management (CRM). Based on interviews with 30 larger nonprofits, “Insights into CRM for Nonprofits” asserts that there are three common but divergent views of CRM: as a system for managing information, as a service for improving relationships with constituents and as an overarching strategy that has the potential to transform a nonprofit’s operations.

The team at Heller argues that, if leveraged as a strategy, CRM can do more than help reduce information siloing within an organization. It can also lead to increased transparency between an organization and its constituents. Though the report is based on interviews with large organizations, it’s chock-full of advice for staffers from smaller organizations just starting to explore a CRM system to manage their data. The study also considers some of the risk inherent in adopting a new CRM stategy, and provides useful perspective on achieving organization-wide buy-in.

The whole thing is worth reading-- you can download the report for free here.

The good folks at Heller also have a good blog post up today called "Nonprofit CRM--What's It To Ya?" that rounds up a few industry experts' takes on the issue, including Idealware's own Laura Quinn. It's a great post, and a good entry to the report. Check it out here.

 

 

Syndicate content